Children’s Institute launched ESS in 2019 with the goal of helping school districts across Oregon improve alignment from preschool through grade 5. Too often, early childhood and K–12 education systems operate independently. When preschools and kindergartens play by different (often unwritten) rules, kids and families are left to navigate the transition on their own. By contrast, improving alignment across the systems can improve transitions, sense of belonging, and quality of instructional experiences for every child.
From the outset of ESS, Children’s Institute knew that a strong research partner would be critical, not only for continuous improvement but also sustainability and scaling.
“We’ve been so busy facilitating meetings and getting everything up and running that it’s been hard to take the time to document all the pieces of this initiative,” said Dr. Merrill. “It is incredibly valuable to have Education Northwest document everything in a way that we can go back and share it with other communities and schools that are interested in this doing this kind of meaningful systems change work and transforming their district’s culture into learning organizations.”
Early on, Children’s Institute and Education Northwest developed a shared understanding of ESS activities and goals. Later, Education Northwest evaluators proposed different measures to capture what Children’s Institute wanted to learn: for example, how teachers experience ESS, or complex multilevel outcomes that unfold across the early learning-to-elementary experience, such as embedding playful, content-based inquiry across grade levels.
“We have the deep relationships and the experience working on the ground, and Education Northwest helps us think about how we might creatively measure what we’re trying to do, which includes a lot of complex components,” said Dr. Merrill.
The Children’s Institute’s deep understanding of district context has been critical to effectively evaluate what’s happening on the ground. Because ESS partners with diverse districts across Oregon—in terms of geography, size, curriculum, data capacity, and student demographics—the evaluation had to be responsive to each community.
“We knew that context would matter from the get-go,” said Dr. Merrill. “We didn’t have existing measures that we could use across all districts. Districts aren’t collecting the same data. No one district has the same curriculum approach, literacy or numeracy approach, or set of progress monitoring tools. You have to know each district very well, learn what their priorities are and what tools they’re using. And that takes a lot of time. It just does. We had to work and build trust with these communities at multiple levels: the teachers, the administrators, even families, in some cases.”